Thursday 14 April 2011

Interesting fact in the judgement

Shiney was accused of section 376 (rape), 342 (wrongful confinement) and 506(II) (criminal intimidation by giving threat to victim).

Now shiney was acquitted for 342 which means he did not confine the victim. He was also acquited for 506(II) which means he did not threaten her. The victim said he did not rape her. I'm not sure whats going on.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

A clear mockery of judgment....We should all get up and support this innocent man an his family who has been suffering.

Anonymous said...

Great observation. Rape is impossible without confinement or threatening.

Vikrant said...

Looking at the "case timeline" tab of this blog, fast track is really not fast. Jun-14-2009 to Mar-30-2011.
Now when shiney is not in fast track, wonder how much time he will be considered convicted of the crime which he did not commit.
Same people who came in the limelight, pronounced him guilty without proof and to gain publicity should again come into the picture and help this poor man by expediting the issue.